Geer v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.

91 S.W.2d 1146
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 1936·No. No. 13322.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of debt and foreclosure of a deed of trust lien rendered against appellant, Geer, and certain other persons, in the district court of Dallas county, in favor of appellee Union Central Life Insurance Company;, Geer alone appealing.

*1147 We find in appellant’s brief nothing- but abstract propositions of law. There is not so much as one of the propositions which purports to be a plain proposition of law covering some part of the record in the case.

We do not find, in appellant’s brief, one assignment of error which is a proposition of law within itself.

Under the rules, statutes, and decisions there must be one or more concrete propositions of law, germane to some assignment or assignments of error, or some one or more of the assignments of error must be a concrete proposition of law, presented in appellant’s brief, before we are called upon to consider the brief. Texas Jurisprudence, vol. 3, pars. 612, 613, and cases cited.

This brings us to the question of fundamental error. Finding none, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geer v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 91 S.W.2d 1146 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

91 S.W.2d 1146 (Geer v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Patterson
94 S.W.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)