Geer v. Underwood Typewriter Co.
This text of 165 S.E. 148 (Geer v. Underwood Typewriter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that there is no error in the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial in this case, and it further appearing that the case was brought to this court for the purpose of delay only, the motion by the defendant in error to assess damages of ten per centum for delay, as provided by the Civil Code (1910), § 6213, is sustained; and such damages are awarded accordingly.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 S.E. 148, 45 Ga. App. 390, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geer-v-underwood-typewriter-co-gactapp-1932.