Geer v. Hovy
1 Root 179
This text of 1 Root 179 (Geer v. Hovy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Geer v. Hovy, 1 Root 179 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
General errors — Judgment reversed, upon the ground that a minor is no more liable in equity than law for fraud in a contract, for if he is incapable of making, he is incapable of committing a fraud in a contract; besides, this would defeat the law made for the protection of minors; if, although they would not be liable upon their contracts yet by using deceit in them, they should be made liable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Creer v. Active Auto Exchange, Inc.
121 A. 888 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1923)
Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer
116 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Slayton v. Barry
49 L.R.A. 560 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geer-v-hovy-connsuperct-1790.