Geer v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Geer v. Brown

90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 24, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 15

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 22, 1916

Docket7568

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 735 (Geer v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geer v. Brown, 90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 24, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, J.

There was in this case a direct issue of fact, and the evidence thereon being conflicting, and the verdict and judgment rendered in the municipal court of Atlanta not being demanded, either by the law or the evidence, or by both, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court the discretion of the judge of the superior court in sustaining the certiorari and granting a first new trial (the order sustaining the certiorari and granting a new trial not being based on any special ground) will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyles, J.

There was in this case a direct issue of fact, and the evidence thereon being conflicting, and the verdict and judgment rendered in the municipal court of Atlanta not being demanded, either by the law or the evidence, or by both, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court the discretion of the judge of the superior court in sustaining the certiorari and granting a first new trial (the order sustaining the certiorari and granting a new trial not being based on any special ground) will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 24, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geer-v-brown-gactapp-1916.