Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission

DecidedJune 20, 2002

DocketI.C. NO. 379173

StatusPublished

This text of Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications (Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

*********** Having considered the submissions of both parties, the Full Commission finds that Dr. John Long has been plaintiff's primary treating psychologist in this matter since 1994 and treatment with Dr. Long for plaintiff's depression appears to be appropriate and consistent with the Opinion and Award entered by the Full Commission on January 28, 2002; therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant shall pay all reasonable charges of Dr. John Long in this matter for treatment of plaintiff's depression. Dr. Long is hereby designated as the primary treating psychologist of plaintiff in this matter pending further orders of the Commission.

No costs are assessed at this time.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** Having considered the submissions of both parties, the Full Commission finds that Dr. John Long has been plaintiff's primary treating psychologist in this matter since 1994 and treatment with Dr. Long for plaintiff's depression appears to be appropriate and consistent with the Opinion and Award entered by the Full Commission on January 28, 2002; therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant shall pay all reasonable charges of Dr. John Long in this matter for treatment of plaintiff's depression. Dr. Long is hereby designated as the primary treating psychologist of plaintiff in this matter pending further orders of the Commission.

No costs are assessed at this time.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Geer v. Bell South Telecommunications, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geer-v-bell-south-telecommunications-ncworkcompcom-2002.