Geelan v. Southern Boulevard Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Geelan v. Southern Boulevard Railroad

168 A.D. 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 898 (Geelan v. Southern Boulevard Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geelan v. Southern Boulevard Railroad, 168 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):

I think that the court erred in- refusing to charge the jury “ that if the jury find that this accident happened entirely by reason of the fact that the left hand horse shied and forced the wagon over against the car, then under the issues presented in this ease their verdict must be for the defendant Bahr.” I, therefore, dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and order appealed from and for a new trial as to the defendant Bahr. Scott, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):

I think that the court erred in- refusing to charge the jury “ that if the jury find that this accident happened entirely by reason of the fact that the left hand horse shied and forced the wagon over against the car, then under the issues presented in this ease their verdict must be for the defendant Bahr.” I, therefore, dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and order appealed from and for a new trial as to the defendant Bahr. Scott, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geelan-v-southern-boulevard-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.