Gee v. Terrio

55 Cal. 381
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 6,559·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. There is in the transcript what purports to be a bill of exceptions, settled and agreed to by the attorneys for the respective parties, but not by the Judge. The Code requires that the bill of exceptions be settled by the judge who presided at the trial, instead of by agreement of the parties. No error appears in the record. Judgment affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., and Morrison, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gee v. Terrio, 55 Cal. 381 (Cal. 1880).

55 Cal. 381 (Gee v. Terrio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paull v. Paull
74 A. 1016 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1910)