Gee v. Terrio

California Supreme Court

Gee v. Terrio

55 Cal. 381

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1880

DocketNo. 6,559

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 Cal. 381 (Gee v. Terrio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gee v. Terrio, 55 Cal. 381 (Cal. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. There is in the transcript what purports to be a bill of exceptions, settled and agreed to by the attorneys for the respective parties, but not by the Judge. The Code requires that the bill of exceptions be settled by the judge who presided at the trial, instead of by agreement of the parties. No error appears in the record. Judgment affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., and Morrison, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. There is in the transcript what purports to be a bill of exceptions, settled and agreed to by the attorneys for the respective parties, but not by the Judge. The Code requires that the bill of exceptions be settled by the judge who presided at the trial, instead of by agreement of the parties. No error appears in the record. Judgment affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., and Morrison, C. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cal. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gee-v-terrio-cal-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack