Gee v. Read
561 S.W.2d 777, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 521, 1977 Tex. LEXIS 284
Opinion
The application for writ of error is denied with the notation, “Refused. No Reversible Error.” Our action should not be interpreted as approving the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that the trial court committed fundamental error which may be reviewed without assignment. 551 S.W.2d 496, 501. The discussion of fundamental error was not material or necessary to the disposition of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gee v. Read, 561 S.W.2d 777, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 521, 1977 Tex. LEXIS 284 (Tex. 1977).
561 S.W.2d 777 (Gee v. Read) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Denman
270 S.W.3d 639 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Watson v. Grissom
675 S.W.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Cunningham v. Parkdale Bank
660 S.W.2d 810 (Texas Supreme Court, 1983)
P. Bosco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. Conley, Lott, Nichols MacHinery Co.
629 S.W.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Williams v. Capitol County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
594 S.W.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)