Gee v. Rafferty
This text of 55 F. App'x 465 (Gee v. Rafferty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alexander Gee appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his class action, which alleged a bankruptcy court judge’s orders in a prior bankruptcy court action violated due process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyler Summit P’ship v. Turner Broad. Sys. Inc., 135 F.3d 658, [466]*466661 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gee-v-rafferty-ca9-2003.