Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES
776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2010 WL 27213
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 *172 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES, 776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2010 WL 27213 (Mich. 2010).
776 N.W.2d 171 (Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)