Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES

776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2010 WL 27213
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 4, 2010
DocketA09-1593
StatusPublished

This text of 776 N.W.2d 171 (Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gee v. NOW TECHNOLOGIES, 776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2010 WL 27213 (Mich. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 *172 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2010 WL 27213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gee-v-now-technologies-minn-2010.