Gee v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.
This text of 711 N.W.2d 75 (Gee v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Waylon E. GEE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR B. MYR INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of whether the current claim for attendant care benefits under MCL 418.315(1) is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.W.2d 75, 474 Mich. 1098, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gee-v-arthur-b-myr-industries-inc-mich-2006.