Gedney Service Station, Inc. v. Sposato Realty, Ltd.

151 A.D.2d 641, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8181
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 A.D.2d 641 (Gedney Service Station, Inc. v. Sposato Realty, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gedney Service Station, Inc. v. Sposato Realty, Ltd., 151 A.D.2d 641, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

In an action by a tenant, inter alia, for injunctive relief against the termination of the tenancy and specific performance of an alleged lease, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Miller, J.), entered November 4, 1988, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and denied the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that an application for a preliminary injunction requires a showing that (1) the movant is likely to succeed ultimately on the merits, (2) the movant will suffer irreparable injury absent granting the preliminary injunction, [642]*642and (3) a balancing of the equities favors granting of the preliminary injunction (see, Weissman v Kubasek, 112 AD2d 1086; Barone v Frie, 99 AD2d 129; 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac If 6301.13a). In the case at bar, there has been a sufficient showing in the moving papers of these three requirements.

We have considered the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Straisa Realty Corp. v. Woodbury Associates
154 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 A.D.2d 641, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gedney-service-station-inc-v-sposato-realty-ltd-nyappdiv-1989.