Geden v. Kostarelos

174 N.E. 129, 273 Mass. 466, 1930 Mass. LEXIS 1379
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 174 N.E. 129 (Geden v. Kostarelos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geden v. Kostarelos, 174 N.E. 129, 273 Mass. 466, 1930 Mass. LEXIS 1379 (Mass. 1930).

Opinion

Rugg, C.J.

The plaintiff seeks in this action of tort to recover compensation for loss sustained by him in his business of conducting a bowling alley as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants in permitting water to leak from their premises used for public baths.

There was evidence tending to show that the defendants owned and controlled a considerable number of baths located on a floor above the bowling alleys of the plaintiff; that at various times water leaked from the premises of the defendants upon the bowling alleys of the plaintiff; that on several occasions the plaintiff went to the premises of the defendants and talked with one of them who pointed out the bath causing the trouble; that the leakage was stopped for a few days and then continually recurred, compelling the plaintiff to close two of his bowling alleys at least twice a week during a period of nine months. This evidence might have been believed, notwithstanding that of a contrary nature. Submission of the case to the jury was required. Goldberg v. Federman, 231 Mass. 443.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. Federman
231 Mass. 443 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.E. 129, 273 Mass. 466, 1930 Mass. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geden-v-kostarelos-mass-1930.