Geddie v. McDonough

941 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18220, 2006 WL 3067439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0869·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley K. Geddie, petitioner, seeks cer-tiorari review of the trial court’s order denying him relief from a disciplinary report issued by the Florida Department of Corrections (Department), forfeiting certain gain time he accumulated while in the custody of the Department. He also seeks relief from the circuit court’s order authorizing the Department to impose a lien against his trust account for the full amount of costs and fees caused by the proceeding he instituted. We deny the petition insofar as it relates to the forfeiture of gain time, because in this respect, we find the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). We agree, however, that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by imposing a lien against petitioner’s trust account. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003); Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition for writ of certiorari DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geddie v. McDonough, 941 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18220, 2006 WL 3067439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 465 (Geddie v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Wagner v. McDonough
927 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)