Geddie v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Geddie v. McDonough

941 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18220, 2006 WL 3067439

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-0869

StatusPublished

This text of 941 So. 2d 465 (Geddie v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geddie v. McDonough, 941 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18220, 2006 WL 3067439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley K. Geddie, petitioner, seeks cer-tiorari review of the trial court’s order denying him relief from a disciplinary report issued by the Florida Department of Corrections (Department), forfeiting certain gain time he accumulated while in the custody of the Department. He also seeks relief from the circuit court’s order authorizing the Department to impose a lien against his trust account for the full amount of costs and fees caused by the proceeding he instituted. We deny the petition insofar as it relates to the forfeiture of gain time, because in this respect, we find the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). We agree, however, that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by imposing a lien against petitioner’s trust account. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003); Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition for writ of certiorari DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stanley K. Geddie, petitioner, seeks cer-tiorari review of the trial court’s order denying him relief from a disciplinary report issued by the Florida Department of Corrections (Department), forfeiting certain gain time he accumulated while in the custody of the Department. He also seeks relief from the circuit court’s order authorizing the Department to impose a lien against his trust account for the full amount of costs and fees caused by the proceeding he instituted. We deny the petition insofar as it relates to the forfeiture of gain time, because in this respect, we find the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). We agree, however, that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by imposing a lien against petitioner’s trust account. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003); Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition for writ of certiorari DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18220, 2006 WL 3067439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geddie-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack