Gebhardt v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJune 18, 2009
DocketI.C. NO. 439721.
StatusPublished

This text of Gebhardt v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Gebhardt v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gebhardt v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. Following its review, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with certain modifications.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. On June 18, 2004, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. *Page 2

2. On June 18, 2004, an employment relationship existed between Plaintiff and Defendant-Employer. Defendant-Employer is self-insured for workers' compensation insurance.

3. On June 18, 2004, Plaintiff sustained injuries to her spine arising out of and in the course of her employment with Defendant-Employer. Defendant-Employer filed a Form 60 for Plaintiff's injury on or about July 22, 2004.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage is $659.28, yielding a compensation rate of $439.54.

5. Plaintiff moved to Florida in November 2004.

6. On or about May 10, 2007, the parties agreed that Dr. Antonio Castellvi would examine and treat plaintiff.

7. Dr. Antonio Castellvi first saw plaintiff on May 10, 2007.

8. On November 14, 2007, Dr. Castellvi recommended Plaintiff undergo a two-level cervical fusion.

9. On November 14, 2007, Dr. Castellvi excused Plaintiff from all work until after the recommended surgery.

10. Beginning November 14, 2007, Defendant paid Plaintiff temporary total disability compensation at the rate of $471.46 per week. Since that time, Defendant has overpaid Plaintiff and is entitled to a credit for the overpayment pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-42.

11. Defendant denied authorization for Plaintiff's surgery.

12. On December 21, 2007, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Authorization of Medical Treatment.

13. By Order dated January 23, 2008, Special Deputy Commissioner Meredith Henderson denied Plaintiff's motion in the administrative forum, indicating that the issues raised *Page 3 would be more appropriately addressed in a full evidentiary hearing before a Deputy Commissioner upon the filing of a Form 33 Request for Hearing.

***********
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is 52 years old. At the time of her injuries, Plaintiff lived in Laurinburg, North Carolina, but has since moved to Florida.

2. Plaintiff obtained a GED and attended some technical college courses. She has worked as a seamstress and in retail, including retail management. Plaintiff worked in several of Defendant's stores between 1998 and 2004. In 2004, she had been working in the Laurinburg store for about two years.

3. On June 18, 2004, Plaintiff was working as an assistant manager in the photo department. A shoplifter trying to run from the store pushed her out of the way and into some metal shelving. Plaintiff's neck hit the shelving and Plaintiff fell to the floor. Plaintiff then went to a magistrate with Defendant's loss prevention officer to press charges. Plaintiff testified that while she was at the magistrate's office, her neck began to hurt significantly. Plaintiff was subsequently taken per Defendant's direction to Scotland Urgent Care Center, where she was examined and excused from work for two days.

4. On follow-up with Dr. James Staten at Scotland Memorial Hospital on June 21, 2004, Plaintiff was diagnosed with a thoracic contusion and cervical strain. Medication, physical therapy, and work restrictions were recommended.

5. A July 28, 2004 MRI of Plaintiff's cervical spine revealed multilevel degenerative disc disease and some degenerative joint disease, particularly at C6-7. When conservative *Page 4 treatment did not improve Plaintiff's symptoms, Dr. Staten recommended evaluation and treatment with an orthopedic physician.

6. On September 3, 2004, at Defendant's direction, Plaintiff presented to Dr. Dixon W. Gerber, an orthopedic physician in Lumberton, North Carolina. She reported neck and upper back pain. Dr. Gerber stated that Plaintiff could return to her regular work with certain restrictions and treated her conservatively with pain medications and muscle relaxers.

7. On October 28, 2004, Plaintiff complained to Dr. Gerber of continued back and neck pain and inquired about surgery as a potential treatment option. Dr. Gerber stated that he did not recommend surgery. Because she was relocating soon to Florida, Dr. Gerber instructed Plaintiff to follow up with a physician in Florida upon her arrival there.

8. Plaintiff and her husband moved to Florida in November 2004. After her move, Plaintiff continued to work for Defendant in a local store. She testified that she requested additional medical treatment from Defendant and the Administrator but was never directed to a doctor in Florida.

9. Plaintiff's employment with Defendant ended around December 2004. Thereafter, Plaintiff went to work as a seamstress for Alterations Unlimited, working about six hours a day, three to five days a week. Plaintiff then moved to another town in Florida and worked as a seamstress for Space Coast Uniforms from August 2006 until the business closed in December 2006.

10. Plaintiff testified that she focused on seamstress work instead of retail work because it required less lifting and prolonged standing. Plaintiff testified that she had trouble with her neck and arms while performing sewing work. *Page 5

11. Beginning about August 2006, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant began searching for an orthopedic physician in Florida who would be willing to treat Plaintiff. By February 8, 2007, Defendant had located one physician willing to review Plaintiff's case, Dr. Antonio Castellvi in Tampa, Florida.

12. On May 10, 2007, after conducting an initial review of her records, Dr. Castellvi examined Plaintiff. Plaintiff reported neck, upper back, and bilateral arm pain, with weakness, numbness, and tingling in her arms and, at times, her legs. Plaintiff described the 2004 injury by accident and reported that her pain had progressed since the injury.

13. Dr. Castellvi ordered cervical spine x-rays, which revealed degenerative changes at multiple levels, with loss of disc height most prominent at C5-6 and C6-7. Dr. Castellvi diagnosed Plaintiff with displacement of cervical intervertebral disc without myelopathy and degeneration of cervical intervertebral disc. He ordered a cervical CT/myelogram and MRI and upper extremity nerve conduction studies, prescribed medication and physical therapy, and excused Plaintiff from work.

14. The MRI of Plaintiff's cervical spine, completed on June 26, 2007, revealed a herniated nucleus pulposus at C3-4 and mild stenosis at C5 through C7 with bilateral neural foraminal encroachment. The nerve conduction study results were mildly abnormal. On August 15, 2007, Dr. Castellvi prescribed medication and physical therapy and stated that Plaintiff would be a surgical candidate if her condition did not improve. Plaintiff was released to activities as tolerated.

15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoyle v. Carolina Associated Mills
470 S.E.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Lanning v. Fieldcrest-Cannon, Inc.
530 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
Devlin v. Apple Gold, Inc.
570 S.E.2d 257 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Smith v. Champion International
517 S.E.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gebhardt v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gebhardt-v-wal-mart-associates-inc-ncworkcompcom-2009.