Gebhardt v. State

218 S.W. 1047, 87 Tex. Crim. 25, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 25, 1920
• Docket: No. 5660.
• Status: Published

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

The information charged and the jury found that the appellant was a delinquent child. The court entered judgment ■ committing him to custody of the Bexar County Training School upon an indeterminate sentence of from 2 to 5 years. A jury having been demanded and empaneled, the trial judge was without power or authority to fix the punishment. The guilt of the appellant, as well as the amount of his punishment, was a) matter exclusively within the province of the jury. This was held in Ex parte Pruitt, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 394, 200 S. W. Rep., 394, and in a number of cases therein referred to.

The facts in evidence do not support the allegations of the complaint, they are insufficient to show that appellant violated any of the laws of the State, and do not afford an adequate foundation for the verdict rendered.

Interesting questions are suggested concerning the validity of some of the provisions of the Delinquent Child Act, Title 17, Texas C. C. P., amended in Chap. 26, Acts Thirty-fifth Legislature, Fourtli Called Session. We are furnished no brief supporting the contentions advanced; and the questions raised are' in the nature of an attack upon the constitutionality of the law, and it not being necessary to the disposition of the case, we pretermit a discussion of them.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.