Gebhardt v. Smith

352 So. 2d 1267, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16891
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1977
DocketNo. 77-861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 So. 2d 1267 (Gebhardt v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gebhardt v. Smith, 352 So. 2d 1267, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16891 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs, record, and oral arguments we hold that the trial court erred in granting appellees/defend-ants’ motion to dismiss the complaint filed [1268]*1268by appellant/plaintiff. The complaint does contain sufficient allegations to withstand attack by a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b).

REVERSED.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewster v. State
352 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 So. 2d 1267, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gebhardt-v-smith-fladistctapp-1977.