Gebaide v. Gebaide

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gebaide v. Gebaide

44 A.D.3d 662, 841 N.Y.S.2d 888

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 A.D.3d 662 (Gebaide v. Gebaide) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gebaide v. Gebaide, 44 A.D.3d 662, 841 N.Y.S.2d 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Phillips, Ct Atty Ref), dated December 18, 2006, as, upon vacating an order of the same court dated November 27, 2006, granting her motion for an award of counsel fees upon the father’s default, denied, without a hearing, her motion for counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has the power to award counsel fees in a custody matter pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (b) (see Matter of Sullivan v Sullivan, 40 AD3d 865 [2007]; Matter of Belle v DeMilia, 19 AD3d 691, 691-692 [2005]). The court should award counsel fees, in its discretion, as “justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties” (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; see Matter of Sullivan v Sullivan, 40 AD3d 865 [2007]; Matter of Grald v Grald, 33 AD3d 922, 923 [2006]; Matter of Dalessandro v O’Brien, 285 AD2d 592, 593 [2001]). Considering all of the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the mother’s motion for an award of counsel fees. Miller, J.P., Skelos, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Phillips, Ct Atty Ref), dated December 18, 2006, as, upon vacating an order of the same court dated November 27, 2006, granting her motion for an award of counsel fees upon the father’s default, denied, without a hearing, her motion for counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has the power to award counsel fees in a custody matter pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (b) (see Matter of Sullivan v Sullivan, 40 AD3d 865 [2007]; Matter of Belle v DeMilia, 19 AD3d 691, 691-692 [2005]). The court should award counsel fees, in its discretion, as “justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties” (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; see Matter of Sullivan v Sullivan, 40 AD3d 865 [2007]; Matter of Grald v Grald, 33 AD3d 922, 923 [2006]; Matter of Dalessandro v O’Brien, 285 AD2d 592, 593 [2001]). Considering all of the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the mother’s motion for an award of counsel fees. Miller, J.P., Skelos, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.3d 662, 841 N.Y.S.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gebaide-v-gebaide-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack