Geasland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Geasland v. State

1930 OK CR 92, 287 P. 1116, 46 Okla. Crim. 282, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 8, 1930·No. No. A-7131.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, eight half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 8th day of August, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, eight half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 8th day of August, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Geasland v. State, 1930 OK CR 92, 287 P. 1116, 46 Okla. Crim. 282, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 92 (Geasland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.