Geasland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Geasland v. State

1930 OK CR 92, 287 P. 1116, 46 Okla. Crim. 282, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 8, 1930

DocketNo. A-7131.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 92 (Geasland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geasland v. State, 1930 OK CR 92, 287 P. 1116, 46 Okla. Crim. 282, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, eight half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 8th day of August, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, eight half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 8th day of August, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 92, 287 P. 1116, 46 Okla. Crim. 282, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geasland-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.