Geary v. Dade Development Corp.

282 N.E.2d 625, 30 N.Y.2d 652, 331 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1437
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Geary v. Dade Development Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 N.Y.2d 457
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1972·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur denied. No reason is shown why the court at Special Term will not he able to resolve residual questions in the action not involved in the appeal, consistently with the decision herein. [See 29 N Y 2d 457.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geary v. Dade Development Corp., 282 N.E.2d 625, 30 N.Y.2d 652, 331 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. 1972).

282 N.E.2d 625 (Geary v. Dade Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.