Gearhead Productions, Inc. v. Gearhead Outfitters, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 23, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-02331
StatusUnknown

This text of Gearhead Productions, Inc. v. Gearhead Outfitters, Inc. (Gearhead Productions, Inc. v. Gearhead Outfitters, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gearhead Productions, Inc. v. Gearhead Outfitters, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 , No. 12 Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE 13 v 14 , 15 Defendant. 16 17 This action has been assigned to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. Both the court and the 18 attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts. To secure the just, 19 speedy and inexpensive determination of every action, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, all counsel are ordered to 20 familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of the Eastern District 21 of California, as well as this order and the court’s civil standing order located on the court’s webpage. 22 As provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 23 THAT: 24 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for _____________ at ______________ 25 before Judge Mueller in Courtroom Three. Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conferences are generally held 26 via videoconference. However, because the format of these hearings is subject to changes depending 27 on the circumstances of each case, check the courtroom calendar to confirm the format of the hearing. 2 DAYS prior to the scheduled conference. 3 2. Plaintiff(s) shall complete service of process on all parties within ninety (90) days of the date 4 of the filing of the complaint, to allow the court to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 5 3. Concurrently with the service of process, or as soon thereafter as possible, plaintiff(s) shall 6 serve upon each of the parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties subsequently joined, a 7 copy of this order, and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. Any 8 party who impleads a third-party defendant shall serve upon that party a copy of this order and shall 9 file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. 10 4. In the event this action was originally filed in a state court and was thereafter removed to 11 this court, the removing party or parties shall, immediately following such removal, serve upon each 12 of the other parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties subsequently joined, a copy of this 13 order and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. 14 5. Unless both parties agree discovery would be premature or the parties have a material 15 dispute about whether early discovery is appropriate, it is advisable for counsel to begin to conduct 16 discovery actively before the Initial Scheduling Conference. At the very least, the parties shall comply 17 fully with the letter and spirit of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) and promptly produce and 18 obtain what they are required to in the early stages of discovery. 19 6. At least twenty-one (21) calendar days before the Status Conference is held, parties shall 20 confer as contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Local Rule 240(b). The parties 21 shall submit, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, a Joint Status Report 22 that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan, with all named parties participating in the preparation

23 and completion of the report. The status report shall address the following matters: 24 (a) a brief summary of the claims and legal theories under which recovery is sought or liability is denied; 25 (b) status of service upon all defendants and cross-defendants; 26 (c) possible joinder of additional parties; 2 (f) anticipated discovery and the scheduling of discovery, including: 3 (1) what changes, if any, should be made in the timing, form, or requirement for disclosures under Rule 26(a), including a statement 4 as to when disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) were made or will be made, and whether further discovery conferences should be held; 5 (2) the subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery 6 should be completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases; 7 (3) what changes, if any, should be made in the limitations on discovery 8 imposed under the Civil Rules and what other limitations, if any, should be imposed; 9 (4) the timing of the disclosure of expert witnesses and information 10 required by Rule 26(a)(2); and 11 (5) proposed dates for discovery cut-off. 12 (g) contemplated dispositive or other motions and a proposed date by which all non-discovery motions shall be heard; 13 (h) methods that can be used from the outset to avoid unnecessary proof and 14 cumulative evidence, and anticipated limitations or restrictions on the use of testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702; 15 (i) a date by which the parties expect to be ready for final pretrial conference; 16 (j) a proposed date by which the parties expect to be ready for trial, estimated number of 17 days of trial, and whether any party has demanded a jury; 18 (k) appropriateness of special procedures such as reference to a special master or agreement to try the matter before the assigned magistrate judge as provided by 19 28 U.S.C. 636(c); 20 (l) proposed modification of standard pretrial procedures because of the simplicity or complexity of the case; 21 (m) whether the case is related to any other case pending in this district, including the 22 bankruptcy court of this district, and whether the case is related to any multidistrict litigation (MDL) such that transfer is possible by the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict 23 Litigation (JPML); 24 (n) optimal timing and method for settlement discussions, including whether a court-convened settlement conference should be scheduled, whether in the 25 case of a jury trial the parties will stipulate to the trial judge acting as a settlement judge, and the parties’ positions with respect to Voluntary Dispute 26 Resolution (VDRP) as required by Local Rule 271(d); and 2 issue a scheduling order governing the future course of the litigation. Counsel are directed to read 3 that order carefully once it is issued. Requests to modify or vacate any date set forth in the order will 4 not be favored and will not be granted absent good cause. 5 8. In the extraordinary event the parties are not able to file a joint status report, each party 6 must file an individual status report and attach a declaration setting forth, in detail, the extraordinary 7 circumstances that prevented the parties from filing a joint status report. 8 9. Any briefs or other papers that a party needs to file prior to the issuance of the scheduling 9 order shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(b). The court places a page limit of twenty 10 (20) pages on all such moving papers. Opposition papers shall be filed in accordance with Local 11 Rule 230(c). The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on oppositions, and a page limit of 12 ten (10) pages for replies. Requests for page limit increases are disfavored, but if made must be 13 filed with the court at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion. Any party that does 14 not oppose the granting of a motion shall file a statement of non-opposition in accordance with 15 Local Rule 230(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gearhead Productions, Inc. v. Gearhead Outfitters, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gearhead-productions-inc-v-gearhead-outfitters-inc-caed-2024.