Gear v. Harrington
This text of 1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 17 (Gear v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
By the Court:
The Justice issued a summons and attachment under the same writ. This procedure he attempts to justify under the Act of May 8, 1876, P. L. 139.
The decisions of the lower Courts are not in entire harmony in the interpretation of this Act of 1876. We shall cast our lot with the majority and hold that the attachment cannot issue without a judgment first had to support it. To read the Act otherwise is to give it extraordinary powers not clearly conferred by the language used.
The third exception is therefore sustained and the proceedings before the Justice are set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gear-v-harrington-pactcomplmontgo-1901.