GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Frew

226 A.D.2d 424, 640 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3565

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant William J. Frew, Jr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), entered May 12,1995, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under these circumstances, where the plaintiff clearly rejected the offer of the defendant William J. Frew, Jr., to transfer the deed to certain mortgaged property as a means of satisfying the indebtedness thereon, there exist no triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff was entitled to foreclose the mortgage (cf., Sanders & Assocs. v Roth, 140 AD2d 513). Sullivan, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Frew, 226 A.D.2d 424, 640 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 424 (GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Frew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thelma Sanders & Associates, Inc. v. Roth
140 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)