G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Senior Care of Clinton, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Senior Care of Clinton, Inc.

200 S.W.3d 556, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 2006 WL 2528476

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 5, 2006

DocketED 87590

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W.3d 556 (G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Senior Care of Clinton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Senior Care of Clinton, Inc., 200 S.W.3d 556, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 2006 WL 2528476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Capital”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of Clinton No. 1, Inc. (“Clinton”) to set aside a default judgment entered against Clinton. Capital contends that the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment in that Clinton did not show proof of good cause to set it aside, and also did not show that it had an arguably meritorious defense to Capital’s claims. Capital further argues that the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment in that Clinton’s motion to set aside was not timely filed.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Capital”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of Clinton No. 1, Inc. (“Clinton”) to set aside a default judgment entered against Clinton. Capital contends that the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment in that Clinton did not show proof of good cause to set it aside, and also did not show that it had an arguably meritorious defense to Capital’s claims. Capital further argues that the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment in that Clinton’s motion to set aside was not timely filed.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 556, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 2006 WL 2528476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ge-capital-information-technology-solutions-inc-v-senior-care-of-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack