Ge Bao v. Peng Li
This text of 35 F. App'x 1 (Ge Bao v. Peng Li) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is
ORDERED that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion of August 28, 2000.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ge-bao-v-peng-li-cadc-2002.