G.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

G.D. v. State

554 So. 2d 618, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289, 1989 WL 155466

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 26, 1989

DocketNo. 89-1181

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 554 So. 2d 618 (G.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G.D. v. State, 554 So. 2d 618, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289, 1989 WL 155466 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes, and we agree, that in the absence of any evidence that the sub[619]*619stance taken from the custody or control of the defendant was cocaine as charged, the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal for the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, should have been granted. See G.E.G. v. State, 417 So.2d 975 (Fla.1982).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes, and we agree, that in the absence of any evidence that the sub[619]*619stance taken from the custody or control of the defendant was cocaine as charged, the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal for the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, should have been granted. See G.E.G. v. State, 417 So.2d 975 (Fla.1982).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 So. 2d 618, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289, 1989 WL 155466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gd-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack