G.D. v. State

554 So. 2d 618, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289, 1989 WL 155466
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 1989·No. No. 89-1181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes, and we agree, that in the absence of any evidence that the sub[619] stance taken from the custody or control of the defendant was cocaine as charged, the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal for the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, should have been granted. See G.E.G. v. State, 417 So.2d 975 (Fla.1982).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G.D. v. State, 554 So. 2d 618, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289, 1989 WL 155466 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

554 So. 2d 618 (G.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. State
639 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)