GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen H. Gilbreath and Robin Gilbreath v. Charter Pipe, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 11, 2023
Docket01-22-00582-CV
StatusPublished

This text of GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen H. Gilbreath and Robin Gilbreath v. Charter Pipe, LLC (GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen H. Gilbreath and Robin Gilbreath v. Charter Pipe, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen H. Gilbreath and Robin Gilbreath v. Charter Pipe, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued July 11, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00582-CV ——————————— GCT LOGISTICS, LLC, STEPHEN J. GILBREATH, AND ROBIN GILBREATH, Appellants V. CHARTER PIPE, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1172782

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen J. Gilbreath, and Robin Gilbreath,

filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 10, 2022 judgment. Appellants

have failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file

brief). On September 1, 2022, the court reporter notified the Court that no reporter’s

record was taken in this case, and on September 17, 2022, the clerk’s record was

filed. Accordingly, appellants’ brief was due to be filed on or before October 19,

2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellants did not file an appellants’ brief.

On October 25, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that this

appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a

brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing

failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal

for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure

to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was

subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GCT Logistics, LLC, Stephen H. Gilbreath and Robin Gilbreath v. Charter Pipe, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gct-logistics-llc-stephen-h-gilbreath-and-robin-gilbreath-v-charter-texapp-2023.