Gcc Technologies, LLC v. United States

Federal Claims

Gcc Technologies, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 12, 2014·No. 14-992·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-992C (Filed December 12, 2014) NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * GCC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * MONTEREY CONSULTANTS, * INC., * * Defendant-intervenor. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Defendant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this case is GRANTED under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The government’s announced corrective action, rescinding the award challenged by this bid protest, makes the matter moot. See Technical Innovation, Inc. v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 276, 279 (2010). The Clerk’s office is directed to close the case, and no costs are awarded. The motions by defendant and defendant-intervenor to stay their obligation to file responses to plaintiff’s motion for judgment and cross- motions are rendered moot by the dismissal of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski VICTOR J. WOLSKI Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-992C (Filed December 12, 2014) NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * GCC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * MONTEREY CONSULTANTS, * INC., * * Defendant-intervenor. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Defendant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this case is GRANTED under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The government’s announced corrective action, rescinding the award challenged by this bid protest, makes the matter moot. See Technical Innovation, Inc. v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 276, 279 (2010). The Clerk’s office is directed to close the case, and no costs are awarded. The motions by defendant and defendant-intervenor to stay their obligation to file responses to plaintiff’s motion for judgment and cross- motions are rendered moot by the dismissal of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski VICTOR J. WOLSKI Judge

Gcc Technologies, LLC v. United States, (uscfc 2014).

Pincite

Gcc Technologies, LLC v. United States (Gcc Technologies, LLC v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related