Gbur v. Golio
947 A.2d 1239
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 22, 2008
Docket423 WAL 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 947 A.2d 1239 (Gbur v. Golio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gbur v. Golio, 947 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the MCARE Act foreclosed a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action against a urologist from offering expert testimony from a radiation oncologist to develop the applicable standard of care for the treatment of a cancer patient, upon the urologist’s review of a bone density study indicating “multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the pelvis, the lower thoracic spine, right ribs, right mandible ... consistent with osseous metastatic disease.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gbur v. Golio
963 A.2d 443 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
947 A.2d 1239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gbur-v-golio-pa-2008.