GBM Global Holding Company Limited v. The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A

S.D. New York

GBM Global Holding Company Limited v. The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 22, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-06284·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Le SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK hate rien; 3/22/22

GBM Global Holding Company Limited, Plaintiff, 21-cv-6284 (AJN) —y— ORDER The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A, Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court on August 23, 2021, issued a preliminary injunction against Defendants. Dkt. No. 25. No activity has occurred in this case since that date. The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file by April 8, 2022, a motion for default judgment or a status update indicating why default judgment should not be filed. Failure to act on this matter may result in Plaintiff's claims being dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See United States ex rel. Drake vy. Norden Sys., 375 F.3d 248, 250 (2d Cir. 2004) (noting “a district judge's authority to dismiss actions based on a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute”). SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2022 le. New York, New York

ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Le SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK hate rien; 3/22/22

GBM Global Holding Company Limited, Plaintiff, 21-cv-6284 (AJN) —y— ORDER The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A, Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court on August 23, 2021, issued a preliminary injunction against Defendants. Dkt. No. 25. No activity has occurred in this case since that date. The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to file by April 8, 2022, a motion for default judgment or a status update indicating why default judgment should not be filed. Failure to act on this matter may result in Plaintiff's claims being dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See United States ex rel. Drake vy. Norden Sys., 375 F.3d 248, 250 (2d Cir. 2004) (noting “a district judge's authority to dismiss actions based on a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute”). SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2022 le. New York, New York

ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

GBM Global Holding Company Limited v. The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

GBM Global Holding Company Limited v. The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A (GBM Global Holding Company Limited v. The Unidentified Individuals Listed on Schedule A) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related