Gazzolo v. Marsullo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gazzolo v. Marsullo

192 A. 28, 121 N.J. Eq. 182, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 515

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the record and conclude that the orders under appeal in this case were quite right in every respect, and they are accordingly affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the record and conclude that the orders under appeal in this case were quite right in every respect, and they are accordingly affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Gazzolo v. Marsullo, 192 A. 28, 121 N.J. Eq. 182, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 515 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

192 A. 28 (Gazzolo v. Marsullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.