Gazquez v. State
This text of 704 So. 2d 219 (Gazquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences raising two issues. We affirm.
As to the first issue regarding allegedly improper comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument, we find that they were either not preserved for appellate review or not inappropriate, and as to the second issue argued by the defendant, regarding the introduction of collateral crime evidence, we find that any alleged error was also not properly preserved for appellate review. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978). Accordingly, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 So. 2d 219, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 381, 1998 WL 17353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gazquez-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.