Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN CHRISTOPHER GAZLAY, No. 83050 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent. JUL 0 1 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK gy PREME COURT BY
DEMI' CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
Our initial review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1135, 1135 (1990); NRS 177.015(2). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
Cadish
J .
Pickering Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
011-1894i0
cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Steven Christopher Gazlay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
489 P.3d 516 (Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.