Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State
This text of 489 P.3d 516 (Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN CHRISTOPHER GAZLAY, No. 83050 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. JUL 0 1 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK gy PREME COURT BY DEMI' CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge. Our initial review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1135, 1135 (1990); NRS 177.015(2). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Cadish
J . Pickering Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
011-1894i0 cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Steven Christopher Gazlay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 P.3d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gazlay-steven-vs-state-nev-2021.