Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State

489 P.3d 516
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2021·No. 83050·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEVEN CHRISTOPHER GAZLAY, No. 83050 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILED

Respondent. JUL 0 1 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK gy PREME COURT BY

DEMI' CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.

Our initial review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion for return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1135, 1135 (1990); NRS 177.015(2). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Cadish

J .

Pickering Herndon

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

011-1894i0

cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Steven Christopher Gazlay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State, 489 P.3d 516 (Neb. 2021).

489 P.3d 516 (Gazlay (Steven) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)