Gazlay (Steven) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Gazlay (Steven) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Gazlay (Steven) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
discretion, Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818
P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and a petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating
that extraordinary relief is warranted, Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,
120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Gazlay argues that the State failed to present exculpatory
evidence to the grand jury and that unrelated and irrelevant testimony
was introduced at the grand jury proceeding. "Dismissal of an indictment
on the basis of governmental misconduct is an extreme sanction that
should be utilized infrequently." Lay v. State, 110 Nev. 1189, 1198, 886
P.2d 448, 454 (1994). The defendant must show substantial prejudice, or a
reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different absent
the misconduct, in order to warrant dismissal of an indictment. Id.; see
also Sheriff v. Keeney, 106 Nev. 213, 216, 791 P.2d 55, 57 (1990).
We conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted.
Gazlay fails to demonstrate a reasonable probability that the grand jury
would not have found probable cause existed to indict him had the letter
been introduced or had the unrelated testimony been omitted. Therefore,
Gazlay fails to demonstrate that the district court manifestly abused its
discretion by denying his pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See
Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 46, 30 P.3d
887, 895-96 (2013) (a district court manifestly abuses its discretion by
denying a pretrial habeas petition when there is no legal evidence to
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A satisfy the elements of the charged offenses in a challenged indictment).
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pairaguirre
fACS u-k Douglas Cherry
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Steven Christopher Gazlay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A .0
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gazlay (Steven) v. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gazlay-steven-v-dist-ct-state-nev-2015.