Gayoso v. Gayoso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gayoso v. Gayoso

702 So. 2d 589, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13317, 1997 WL 731817

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 26, 1997

DocketNo. 97-2451

StatusPublished

This text of 702 So. 2d 589 (Gayoso v. Gayoso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gayoso v. Gayoso, 702 So. 2d 589, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13317, 1997 WL 731817 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the trial court’s award of child custody to the wife and requirement that appellant attend a batterer’s intervention program. However, the trial court erred when it ordered child support exceeding five percent of the amount permitted in the child support guidelines because it did not state specific reasons why the guideline amount was unjust or inappropriate. See §§ 61.30(l)(a) & (6), 741.30(6)(a)4, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). We reverse the amount of child support awarded and remand to the trial [590]*590eourt with instructions to recalculate the sum of child support consistent with the guidelines, or in the alternative, to specify the reasons for its departure. In all other respects, the injunction for protection against domestic violence is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

DELL, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the trial court’s award of child custody to the wife and requirement that appellant attend a batterer’s intervention program. However, the trial court erred when it ordered child support exceeding five percent of the amount permitted in the child support guidelines because it did not state specific reasons why the guideline amount was unjust or inappropriate. See §§ 61.30(l)(a) & (6), 741.30(6)(a)4, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). We reverse the amount of child support awarded and remand to the trial [590]*590eourt with instructions to recalculate the sum of child support consistent with the guidelines, or in the alternative, to specify the reasons for its departure. In all other respects, the injunction for protection against domestic violence is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

DELL, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 So. 2d 589, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13317, 1997 WL 731817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gayoso-v-gayoso-fladistctapp-1997.