Gaynor v. Wood
This text of 64 Va. Cir. 143 (Gaynor v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Richmond County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following the hearing on defendant’s, motion to change venue, I read Meyer v. Brown, 256 Va. 53 (1998), cited by defendant in support of the motion.
Without recounting all the particulars, the parties agree that any basis for venpe here would be derived from defendant’s contacts with her gynecologist centering around office visits and surgeiy and follow-up surgery, all occurring here both before and after filing.
Considering Meyer, I do not think the activity is either “affairs or business activity” as either commercial, professional, or public business or business activity. The motion therefore is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 Va. Cir. 143, 2004 Va. Cir. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaynor-v-wood-vaccrichmondcty-2004.