Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Gaynor v. Village of Port Chester

Gaynor v. Village of Port Chester

188 A.D. 975
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gaynor v. Village of Port Chester. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 A.D. 122 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1919·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Blackmar, J., dissented upon the ground that the learning of Wakefield v. Brophy (67 Misc. Rep. 298; affd., sub nom. Wakefield v. Gaynor, 144 App. Div. 905; affd., 207 N. Y. 772) does not apply, inasmuch as the express statute

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor v. Village of Port Chester, 188 A.D. 975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

188 A.D. 975 (Gaynor v. Village of Port Chester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wakefield v. . Gaynor
101 N.E. 1125 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
Wakefield v. Gaynor
144 A.D. 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Wakefield v. Brophy
67 Misc. 298 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)