Gaynor v. State
This text of Gaynor v. State (Gaynor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MARCUS GAYNOR, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4841 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed September 15, 2017.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.
Marcus Gaynor, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Marcus Gaynor appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the denial without
comment but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Stevens v. State, 114
So. 3d 485, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Richardson v. State, 787 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2001).
Our review of the record reveals a scrivener's error in the amended
judgment entered October 20, 2015. The amended judgment erroneously reflects that
Gaynor was convicted in counts two and three of attempted sexual battery instead of sexual battery as is indicated on the jury's written verdict form. Accordingly, we remand
for correction of the scrivener's error in the amended judgment.
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
CASANUEVA, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gaynor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaynor-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.