Gaynes v. Salter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gaynes v. Salter

277 A.D.2d 842

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 842 (Gaynes v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaynes v. Salter, 277 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

By reason of the “ Controlled Housing Rent Regulation for New York City Defense-Rental Area ” (see Friedlander and Curreri on Rent Control, appendix B, p. 31, reg., § 1, par. v), the Housing Expediter was empowered to reject the leases because they did not become effective before January 1, 1948. We are agreed that overpayments collected by the owner would not constitute an offset against rent due the receivers. Determination unanimously affirmed. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 873.]’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By reason of the “ Controlled Housing Rent Regulation for New York City Defense-Rental Area ” (see Friedlander and Curreri on Rent Control, appendix B, p. 31, reg., § 1, par. v), the Housing Expediter was empowered to reject the leases because they did not become effective before January 1, 1948. We are agreed that overpayments collected by the owner would not constitute an offset against rent due the receivers. Determination unanimously affirmed. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 873.]’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaynes-v-salter-nyappdiv-1950.