Gaylor v. Dyer

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Gaylor v. Dyer

10 F. Cas. 120, 5 D.C. 461, 5 Cranch 461

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMarch 15, 1838

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 F. Cas. 120 (Gaylor v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaylor v. Dyer, 10 F. Cas. 120, 5 D.C. 461, 5 Cranch 461 (circtddc 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon the trial, the Court

(Cranch, C. J.,

giving no opinion,) instructed the jury, at the motion of Mr. Goxe, for the plaintiffs, that the said instrument of writing, “ is evidence of a conditional sale; and that the chest therein mentioned was, under said agreement, the property of plaintiffs until the payment of the notes given by said Myers; and unless the jury shall believe, from the evidence, that said notes are paid, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover.”

Verdict for plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon the trial, the Court

(Cranch, C. J.,

giving no opinion,) instructed the jury, at the motion of Mr. Goxe, for the plaintiffs, that the said instrument of writing, “ is evidence of a conditional sale; and that the chest therein mentioned was, under said agreement, the property of plaintiffs until the payment of the notes given by said Myers; and unless the jury shall believe, from the evidence, that said notes are paid, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover.”

Verdict for plaintiffs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. Cas. 120, 5 D.C. 461, 5 Cranch 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaylor-v-dyer-circtddc-1838.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack