Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King v. Floyd Walker
This text of Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King v. Floyd Walker (Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King v. Floyd Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-09-00428-CV
GAYLELYNN R. KING AND SARAH KING, Appellants v.
FLOYD WALKER, Appellee
From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. C200700530
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King, appealed a judgment rendered
against them pursuant to a jury trial. The appeal was referred to mediation. In
response to a request for a mediation status report from the Kings, the Court received a
letter dated June 2, 2010 from the Kings’ attorney informing the Court that he believed a
settlement had been reached and was awaiting the signature of one of the parties.
When no further information about the settlement was received, the Clerk of this Court
again sent a letter to the Kings. By that letter, dated June 25, 2010, the Kings were
notified that they must provide the Court with a motion to dismiss or a status report regarding the appeal within 14 days from the date of the letter. The Clerk also warned
the Kings that if the Court did not timely receive a motion to dismiss the appeal or a
status report regarding the appeal, the appeal would be dismissed for want of
prosecution.
More than 14 days have passed, and we have not received a motion to dismiss
the appeal or a status report regarding the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); §
51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these circumstances,
we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case.
TEX. R. APP. P. 2. . The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in
no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 28, 2010 [CV06]
King v. Walker Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gaylelynn R. King and Sarah King v. Floyd Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaylelynn-r-king-and-sarah-king-v-floyd-walker-texapp-2010.