Gayle v. Randle
This text of 4 Port. 232 (Gayle v. Randle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The judgments in this cases must be affirmed. The demurrer to the second plea was properly sustained.
When special pleas are agreed to be taken in [233]*233short, by consent of counsel, it can only be understood by the Court, that matters of formare waived, —they must contain substance, or that which, if admitted, will make out a case for the party pleading.
By reference to. the case in 1 Stewart, 11, relied on by the plaintiff in error, it will be seen, that the plea does not state facts sufficient, under that decision, to make out a defence. It does not state, that the means of recovering the debt, have been lost by the negligence of the plaintiff; neither do.es if state? that the notice was in writing.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Port. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gayle-v-randle-ala-1836.