Gayle v. Randle

4 Port. 232
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The judgments in this cases must be affirmed. The demurrer to the second plea was properly sustained.

When special pleas are agreed to be taken in [233]*233short, by consent of counsel, it can only be understood by the Court, that matters of formare waived, —they must contain substance, or that which, if admitted, will make out a case for the party pleading.

By reference to. the case in 1 Stewart, 11, relied on by the plaintiff in error, it will be seen, that the plea does not state facts sufficient, under that decision, to make out a defence. It does not state, that the means of recovering the debt, have been lost by the negligence of the plaintiff; neither do.es if state? that the notice was in writing.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gayle v. Randle, 4 Port. 232 (Ala. 1836).

4 Port. 232 (Gayle v. Randle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Standard Ins.
73 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Foxworth v. White
72 Ala. 224 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)
Pollard v. Stanton
5 Ala. 451 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1843)