Gayle v. Randle

1 Stew. 529
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the CHIEF JUSTICE.

On a consideration of all the points presented by the bill of exceptions, we have no hesitation in sustaining the Judge of the Circuit Court in his decision on every one of them. It is very clear, that if such set-offs were allowed, it would exceedingly embarrass the settlement of estates. We say, too, on the other points, that the plaintiff most satisfactorily accounted for all the circumstances attending the order, from the time it was improperly obtained from him, to the final production of it on the trial. There never was a case better made out. The judgement must be affirmed.

Judge Crenshaw dissenting. Judge White not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gayle v. Randle, 1 Stew. 529 (Ala. 1828).

1 Stew. 529 (Gayle v. Randle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Locke v. Locke
57 Ala. 473 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Driver v. Hudspeth
16 Ala. 348 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)