Gayle v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 2008
Docket07-7751
StatusUnpublished

This text of Gayle v. Johnson (Gayle v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gayle v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7751

ST. AUBYN SEBASTIAN GAYLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-6036

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cv-00681-REP)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to toll the limitation period for filing

a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and

his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Gayle v. Johnson, No.

3:05-cv-00681-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2007 & Dec. 18, 2007).

Additionally, we deny Gayle’s motion for production of documents.*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Though Gayle has filed a motion for production of documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, the Act is not applicable to federal courts. 5 U.S.C. §§ 551(1)(B), 552(f)(1) (2000).

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
5 U.S.C. § 551(1)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gayle v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gayle-v-johnson-ca4-2008.