Gaylan Segrest and Dianne Segrest, in Their Individual Capacities and as Next Friends of Gabriel Segrest v. Sue Weller and St. Thomas Episcopal School

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 28, 2000
Docket13-00-00669-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gaylan Segrest and Dianne Segrest, in Their Individual Capacities and as Next Friends of Gabriel Segrest v. Sue Weller and St. Thomas Episcopal School (Gaylan Segrest and Dianne Segrest, in Their Individual Capacities and as Next Friends of Gabriel Segrest v. Sue Weller and St. Thomas Episcopal School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaylan Segrest and Dianne Segrest, in Their Individual Capacities and as Next Friends of Gabriel Segrest v. Sue Weller and St. Thomas Episcopal School, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

 
NUMBER 13-00-669-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

GAYLAN SEGREST AND DIANNE SEGREST,

IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND AS

NEXT FRIENDS OF GABRIEL SEGREST

, Appellants,

v.


SUE WELLER AND ST. THOMAS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL

, Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court
of Wharton County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Dorsey and
Rodriguez
Opinion Per Curiam


Appellants, GAYLAN SEGREST AND DIANNE SEGREST, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF GABRIEL SEGREST, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 36,216-S. After the record was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a compromise settlement agreement in this matter.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties' joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Opinion ordered not published.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28th day of December, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gaylan Segrest and Dianne Segrest, in Their Individual Capacities and as Next Friends of Gabriel Segrest v. Sue Weller and St. Thomas Episcopal School, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaylan-segrest-and-dianne-segrest-in-their-individ-texapp-2000.