Gaye v. Adnom Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gaye v. Adnom Realty, Inc.

278 A.D.2d 43, 717 N.Y.S.2d 168, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12634

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about November 10, 1999, which granted the motion of third-party defendant Sengane Power Systems, Inc. to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126, and the cross motion of defendant Adnom Realty, Inc. to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiff stipulated that he would provide deposition testimony as to his actual identity, he failed to appear at three separately scheduled depositions, and, when finally deposed, was unprepared to furnish responsive answers, leav[44] ing the issue of his identity and use of an alias unresolved. Further frustrating resolution of the identity issue was plaintiffs refusal to comply with the court’s direction that he provide authorizations for the release of immigration and social security records. Accordingly, in view of plaintiffs persistent noncompliance with discovery, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3126. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about November 10, 1999, which granted the motion of third-party defendant Sengane Power Systems, Inc. to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126, and the cross motion of defendant Adnom Realty, Inc. to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiff stipulated that he would provide deposition testimony as to his actual identity, he failed to appear at three separately scheduled depositions, and, when finally deposed, was unprepared to furnish responsive answers, leav[44] ing the issue of his identity and use of an alias unresolved. Further frustrating resolution of the identity issue was plaintiffs refusal to comply with the court’s direction that he provide authorizations for the release of immigration and social security records. Accordingly, in view of plaintiffs persistent noncompliance with discovery, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3126. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Gaye v. Adnom Realty, Inc., 278 A.D.2d 43, 717 N.Y.S.2d 168, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 43 (Gaye v. Adnom Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related