Gay v. Stewart
This text of 195 So. 285 (Gay v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The submission was on motion to dismiss the suit for failure of plaintiff, as a nonresident, to give security for costs. Code of 1923, § 7252; Ex parte State ex rel. Altman, 237 Ala. 642, 188 So. 685.
The bill of exceptions affirmatively shows that it does not contain all the evidence. The conclusions of fact of the trial court cannot be reviewed. Taylor v. Hoffman, 231 Ala. 39, 163 So. 339; Patton v. Endowment Dept., etc., 232 Ala. 236, 167 So. 323; City of Roanoke v. Johnson, 229 Ala. 496, 158 So. 182; Hamrick v. Town of Albertville, 228 Ala. 666, 155 So. 87; Wood v. Wood, 119 Ala. 183, 24 So. 841. Such is the condition of this bill of exceptions.
The action of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 So. 285, 239 Ala. 428, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-v-stewart-ala-1940.