Gay v. State.1

2015 Ark. 468
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 10, 2015
DocketCR-15-948
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. 468 (Gay v. State.1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gay v. State.1, 2015 Ark. 468 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 468

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-948

RANDY WILLIAM GAY Opinion Delivered December 10, 2015 APPELLANT MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS MOTION GRANTED. APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

Appellant Randy William Gay, through his attorney Mark S. Fraiser, brings the instant

motion for rule on clerk. Gay seeks to appeal the March 20, 2015 sentencing order

convicting him of capital murder and sentencing him to death. He timely filed a notice of

appeal on March 23, 2015, causing the record to be due in the office of this court’s clerk no

later than October 20, 2015. Gay did not submit the record by that date because his counsel

requested and received an extension beyond the seven-month period allotted by Rule 4(c)(2)

of the Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated

appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). In that case, we

identified only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party

or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason. McDonald, 356 Ark. at 116,

146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained as follows: Cite as 2015 Ark. 468

Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires

an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly

admit fault where he or she has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal.

Id. When it is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under either

rule based on error or good reason, the relief will be granted. Id. If there is attorney error,

a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

It is plain from the motion and record before us that there was error on Mr. Fraiser’s

part in failing to timely lodge the record. Pursuant to McDonald, we grant Gay’s motion for

rule on clerk and forward a copy of this opinion to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. State
146 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-v-state1-ark-2015.