Gay v. State

219 S.E.2d 156, 235 Ga. 240, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 844
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1975
Docket30228
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 219 S.E.2d 156 (Gay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gay v. State, 219 S.E.2d 156, 235 Ga. 240, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 844 (Ga. 1975).

Opinion

Nichols, Chief Justice.

The appellant was tried and convicted for the offenses of murder and carrying a pistol without a license. [241]*241She was sentenced to life imprisonment on the murder charge and 12 months for the pistol violation to run concurrently with the life sentence. The appellant appeals from the overruling of her motion for new trial on the usual general grounds.

Submitted August 15, 1975 Decided September 23, 1975. Dorothy D. Atkins, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Julius C. Daugherty, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

1. The appellant has neither argued in her brief nor cited any authority concerning the conviction of carrying a pistol without a license. Accordingly, as to this conviction the motion for new trial is deemed abandoned.

2. The appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to convict her of murder. She testified that she was in fear of her life and shot the victim only in order to escape, and that the victim was holding a knife on her prior to his leaving the car to enter a liquor store.

A passenger in the car testified that he did not see any knife. This witness further testified that the appellant got out of the car, began shooting at the victim, chased him around the car still shooting, finally hitting him, and then stood over him and fired the last bullet into his body. Two clerks in the liquor store testified to substantially the same facts.

The evidence authorized the conviction and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
882 S.E.2d 289 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
Davenport v. State
846 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.E.2d 156, 235 Ga. 240, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-v-state-ga-1975.