Gay v. Hester

51 So. 329, 164 Ala. 651, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 267
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 16, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 So. 329 (Gay v. Hester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gay v. Hester, 51 So. 329, 164 Ala. 651, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 267 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.-

Statutory ejectment by appellees against appellants. There are eight assignments of error, but only that numbered 1 is insisted on in brief of counsel for appellant. There is argument and citation of authority addressed to asserted errors on the trial, but these are not among the assignments. Of course, such matters cannot be considered, unless assigned as error. The mere statement in brief that certain acts of the trial court were erroneous, will not avail to invoke the consideration thereof here. They will be treated as waived. — 2 May. Dig. 147, et seq.; 5 May. Dig. 35.

The first assignment complains of the admission in evidence of what purported to be a deed from Wood to Moses, of date December 4,1868, describing a part of the lands in dispute. The court admitted it as showing-color of title. The appellants’ criticism is that the instrument was not efficaciously executed.. The criticism is ill-founded, and the court properly ruled in admitting the paper, as has long been settled here. Some of the authorities on the proposition are collected in 5 May. Dig. 161.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Ry. Co. v. Lime Cola Bottling Co.
98 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Hines v. McMillan
87 So. 691 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 329, 164 Ala. 651, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-v-hester-ala-1909.